Friday, January 25, 2013

Electric car ferry to recharge in 10 minutes

4 hrs.

From the U.S. Pacific Northwest to Norway and hundreds of points in between, every day thousands of people drive their cars onto ferries to get across bodies of water. That trip will start to have a different kind of buzz in 2015 thanks to the world?s first electrically?powered car ferry.

The 262-foot catamaran will carry up to 120 cars and 360 passengers, according to Siemens, which is building the boat with the Norwegian shipyard Fjellstrand. It will sail about a four-mile route across a fjord in Norway that connects the tiny towns of Lavik and Oppedal.

The ferry?s 11-ton batteries will recharge during the 10-minute break between runs, according to Siemens. Interestingly,?the batteries on the boat will be charged up using batteries on the dock. The dock batteries, in turn, are recharged with electricity from the grid.

The new ferry will save the approximately 264,000 gallons of diesel the current ferry burns annually and the related 2,900 tons of carbon dioxide emissions.?

The electrically?powered ferry was developed for a competition organized by Norway's Ministry of Transport. It won a license to operate the route until 2025.?

According to Siemens, all crossings in Norway shorter than 30 minutes could be served with electric ferries using today?s battery and recharging technology. If so, some of those ferries could find a home crossing parts of the Pacific Northwest?s Puget Sound.

-?via Fast Company

John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News Digital. To learn more about him, check out his website. For more of our Future of Technology series, watch the featured video below.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/futureoftech/electric-car-ferry-recharge-10-minutes-1C8108642

vcu unlv sam young ncaa bracket ramon sessions portland trail blazers nba trade

Ian McKellen, Patrick Stewart heading to Broadway

FILE - This May 22, 2006 file photo shows actors Patrick Stewart, left, and Ian McKellen during a photo call for the film "X-Men: The Last Stand," at the 59th International film festival in Cannes, southern France. McKellen and Patrick Stewart will team up on Broadway this fall in two of the most iconic plays of the 20th century. Producers said Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that Stewart and McKellen will star in Harold Pinter's ?No Man's Land? and Samuel Beckett's ?Waiting for Godot? in repertoire under the direction of Sean Mathias. The theatre, performance dates and schedule will be announced later. (AP Photo/Jeff Christensen, file)

FILE - This May 22, 2006 file photo shows actors Patrick Stewart, left, and Ian McKellen during a photo call for the film "X-Men: The Last Stand," at the 59th International film festival in Cannes, southern France. McKellen and Patrick Stewart will team up on Broadway this fall in two of the most iconic plays of the 20th century. Producers said Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that Stewart and McKellen will star in Harold Pinter's ?No Man's Land? and Samuel Beckett's ?Waiting for Godot? in repertoire under the direction of Sean Mathias. The theatre, performance dates and schedule will be announced later. (AP Photo/Jeff Christensen, file)

FILE - This May 22, 2006 file photo shows actors Patrick Stewart, left, and Ian McKellen during a photo call for the film "X-Men: The Last Stand," at the 59th International film festival in Cannes, southern France. McKellen and Patrick Stewart will team up on Broadway this fall in two of the most iconic plays of the 20th century. Producers said Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, that Stewart and McKellen will star in Harold Pinter's ?No Man's Land? and Samuel Beckett's ?Waiting for Godot? in repertoire under the direction of Sean Mathias. The theatre, performance dates and schedule will be announced later. (AP Photo/Jeff Christensen, file)

(AP) ? Serious theater fans have a reason to suddenly freak out: Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart will team up on Broadway this fall in two of the most iconic plays of the 20th century.

Producers announced Thursday that Stewart and McKellen will star in Harold Pinter's "No Man's Land" and Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot" which will play in repertoire under the direction of Sean Mathias.

The Broadway theater, performance dates, the two supporting actors and the schedule of performances will be announced later.

Stewart and McKellen starred in a production of "Waiting for Godot" in London's West End in 2009. Prior to Broadway, they'll tackle "No Man's Land" in an as-yet-unspecified out-of-town tryout this summer.

Mathias told The Associated Press all three men struggled to make "Waiting for Godot" as honest and realistic as possible ? an approach they'll likely replicate with Pinter's play.

"What we tried to do, with so much effort, was make it real. Make them human beings, compassionate, funny, flawed and vulnerable and cocky ? all the things human beings are," Mathias said. "We never wanted to make it esoteric. I'm sure this is how we will approach the Pinter as well."

Stewart, 72, and McKellen, 73, first worked together in 1977 in Tom Stoppard's "Every Good Boy Deserves Favour." They've also starred in the "X-Men" movie franchise as Professor Xavier and Magneto.

Stewart will play Vladimir in "Waiting for Godot" and Hirst in "No Man's Land;" McKellen will play Estragon in "Waiting for Godot" and Spooner in "No Man's Land."

"My main feeling is it's lovely to be back with friends and it will be lovely to be back in New York," said McKellen, who is doing a sit-com in England and next goes to Middle Earth to film scenes for "The Hobbit" franchise. "But I've got an awful lot to do in the meantime."

McKellen made his Broadway debut in Aleksei Arbuzov's "The Promise" in 1967 and won a Tony Award for his performance in "Amadeus" in 1981. His films include "Apt Pupil," ''Gods and Monsters" and "The Lord of the Rings."

Stewart, perhaps best known as Capt. Jean-Luc Picard of "Star Trek: The Next Generation," first appeared on Broadway in Peter Brook's production of Shakespeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream" in 1971 and has recently been in David Mamet's "A Life in the Theatre" and "Macbeth."

Putting the Beckett and Pinter plays together in repertoire makes theatrical sense since both require four male actors and they both mine a surreal, witty vein.

"Both plays play tricks with our memory, with time, with what time is," said Mathias. "Both plays are dealing with a landscape of poetry, a landscape of psychology, a landscape that is both real and isn't real. So there are incredible reverberations and resonances."

Stewart and McKellen will sink their teeth into Beckett and Pinter after spending the summer filming "X-Men: Days of Future Past." Mathias, a Tony nominee in 1995 for "Indiscretions," will be directing "Breakfast at Tiffany's" on Broadway this spring.

Now a thorny question: Who gets top billing on Broadway ? McKellen or Stewart? After all, both actors have gotten knighthoods for their services to drama and the performing arts.

"For me there's no question," Stewart said. "Ian was a star actor while I was still working in regional theater. To be absolutely frank, I was in awe of him and his work long before I knew him."

___

Follow Mark Kennedy on Twitter at http://twitter.com/KennedyTwits

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-01-24-Theater-McKellen-Stewart/id-6c14e4892bbb4123a4575d33c11366f7

the replacements how to hard boil eggs new nfl uniforms easter derbyshire the matrix oceans 11

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Rise of Israeli centrist raises hopes for peace

Yair Lapid, leader of Yesh Atid party gives a statement outside his home in Tel Aviv, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013. Yesh Atid, or There is a Future, party, turned pre-election forecasts on their heads and dealt Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu a sharp political blow. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

Yair Lapid, leader of Yesh Atid party gives a statement outside his home in Tel Aviv, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013. Yesh Atid, or There is a Future, party, turned pre-election forecasts on their heads and dealt Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu a sharp political blow. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pauses while delivering a statement at his office in Jerusalem, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013. A weakened Netanyahu scrambled Wednesday to keep his job by extending his hand to a new centrist party that advocates a more earnest push on peacemaking with the Palestinians and whose surprisingly strong showing broadsided him with a stunning election deadlock. (AP Photo/Darren Whiteside, Pool)

A worker removes election banner of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013. A weakened Netanyahu scrambled Wednesday to keep his job by extending his hand to a new centrist party that advocates a more earnest push on peacemaking with the Palestinians and whose surprisingly strong showing broadsided him with a stunning election deadlock. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

Yair Lapid, leader of Yesh Atid party gives a statement outside his home in Tel Aviv, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013. Yesh Atid, or There is a Future, party, turned pre-election forecasts on their heads and dealt Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu a sharp political blow. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

(AP) ? The unexpectedly strong showing by a new centrist party in Israel's parliamentary election has raised hopes of a revival of peace talks with Palestinians that have languished for four years under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Political newcomer Yair Lapid, the surprise kingmaker, is already being courted by a weakened Netanyahu, who needs his support to form a ruling coalition. Lapid has said he will not sit in the government unless the peace process is restarted.

But following a campaign in which the Palestinian issue was largely ignored, it remains unclear how hard Lapid will push the issue in what could be weeks of coalition talks with Netanyahu.

Tuesday's election ended in a deadlock, with Netanyahu's hard-line religious bloc of allies and the rival bloc of centrist, secular and Arab parties each with 60 seats, according to near-complete official results. Opinion polls had universally forecast a majority of seats going to the right-wing bloc.

While Netanyahu, as head of the largest single party in parliament, is poised to remain prime minister, it appears impossible for him to cobble together a majority coalition without reaching across the aisle.

Lapid, whose Yesh Atid ? or There is a Future ? captured 19 seats, putting it in second place, is the most likely candidate to join him. In a gesture to Netanyahu, Lapid said there would not be a "blocking majority," in which opposition parties prevent the prime minister from forming a government. The comment virtually guarantees that Netanyahu will be prime minister, with Lapid a major partner.

Netanyahu said Wednesday he would work to create a wide coalition stretching across the political divide.

Speaking to reporters, he said the election proved "the Israeli public wants me to continue leading the country" and put together "as broad a coalition as possible."

He said the next government would pursue three major domestic policy goals: to bring ultra-Orthodox Jewish men, who are routinely granted draft exemptions, into the military, to provide affordable housing and to change the current fragmented multiparty system, which often gives smaller coalition partners outsize strength.

But Netanyahu only alluded to peacemaking in vague terms, saying coalition talks would focus on "security and diplomatic responsibility." He took no questions from reporters and immediately walked out of the room.

Netanyahu's comments were clearly aimed at the 49-year-old Lapid, a popular former TV talk-show host who has portrayed himself as an average Israeli and champion of a middle class struggling to make ends meet.

Though committed to pursuing peace, Lapid's campaign focused heavily on pocketbook issues, raising speculation that Lapid might abandon the peace agenda if he can extract other concessions from Netanyahu.

In an interview with The Associated Press last week, Lapid criticized Netanyahu's handling of peace efforts, saying he was committed to restarting negotiations and would not serve as a "fig leaf" in a hard-line government.

Dov Lipman, a lawmaker in Lapid's party, said Yesh Atid was serious about resuming talks with the Palestinians. He said the party's strong performance "clearly says the people of Israel, while focusing on internal issues ... do understand we have to be in negotiations, exploring solutions and have to be trying to get to the two-state solution."

"We feel that with a sincere approach from the Israeli side, showing we're serious, we can make progress," he said. "We don't feel it's responsible leadership to be in a government which is not trying to move forward in negotiations."

Talks have ground to a standstill during Netanyahu's past four years in office, in large part because of his continued construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. The Palestinians claim both areas, captured by Israel in 1967, for a future state and refuse to negotiate while the construction continues.

Under Israel's election laws, President Shimon Peres must formally charge Netanyahu with the task of forming a new coalition within six weeks.

If he reaches a power-sharing deal with Lapid, it remains far from clear whether it would be enough to restart talks. While Netanyahu has grudgingly accepted the idea of establishing a Palestinian state, his Likud Party is dominated by hard-liners who oppose Palestinian independence.

Another potential coalition partner, Naftali Bennett of the pro-settler Jewish Home Party, has called for annexing large parts of the West Bank, the heartland of a future Palestine. Netanyahu will be hard-pressed to balance the competing visions of Bennett and Lapid, and resumption of negotiations would likely spark a revolt within his hard-line base of support. A continued 60/60 deadlock would trigger new elections.

On the other hand, Lapid's positions, while generous in Israeli terms, still fall short of Palestinian demands for a full withdrawal from all of the West Bank and east Jerusalem. Lapid says east Jerusalem, home to Jewish, Christian and Muslim holy sites, must remain under Israeli control. He has also refused to say whether he accepts a freeze in settlement building, a key Palestinian demand.

In the West Bank city of Ramallah, Palestinian leaders said Wednesday they were pleasantly surprised by the strong showing by Israel's moderates, but remained doubtful that would soften Netanyahu's policies.

"You are not going to have a savior suddenly producing instant peace," said Hanan Ashrawi, a senior official with the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Opinion polls in Israel have indicated a majority favor establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel. Yet during the election campaign, the need to reach peace was barely mentioned, reflecting widespread doubts, even among the dovish left, that peace is possible.

The outcome of Tuesday's election shocked Israel, where Netanyahu had been forecast by all opinion polls to be cruising toward re-election at the helm of a hard-line and religious bloc.

Netanyahu's Likud-Yisrael Beitenu alliance captured just 31 seats, down from 42 in the outgoing parliament. After the shocking setback, Netanyahu found himself answering tough questions about what went wrong.

Avraham Diskin, a political scientist from Jerusalem's Hebrew University, said Netanyahu's merger with former Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's Yisrael Beiteinu turned out to be a huge error. The union was supposed to create a strong rightist bloc immune from blackmail attempts of smaller parties.

In practice, Diskin said, it backfired because the parties' constituencies have little in common. Likud appeals to traditional, religious Jews and those of Middle Eastern descent. Lieberman's base are immigrants from the former Soviet Union. Lieberman's indictment on corruption charges during the campaign also hurt the alliance.

"This was a harsh error. It was the deciding factor," Diskin said.

Netanyahu made other gaffes. His campaign, including photo ops with young smiling soldiers and stops at Jewish holy sites, appeared to take victory for granted. An attack on Bennett, the settler leader, ended up rallying sympathy for his rival, and the last-minute appointment of a popular Likud Cabinet minister to a senior government post appeared to be a desperate attempt to win over voters.

In the background, Netanyahu's tense relations with key allies, including the United States, over settlement construction also may have concerned voters. In the weeks before the vote, Netanyahu announced plans to build thousands of new settlement homes. Last week, President Barack Obama was quoted as saying Netanyahu was hurting Israel's own interests with the settlement construction.

On Wednesday, White House spokesman Jay Carney pushed back on the notion that Obama and Netanyahu need to recalibrate their relationship.

"No leader has met more often with or spent more time on the phone with President Obama than Prime Minister Netanyahu. That relationship is strong, and it is a relationship that allows for a free and open discussion of ideas and positions," Carney said.

Sima Kadmon, a veteran political columnist for the Yediot Ahronot daily, said the election results did not represent a a major shift in ideology but rather disappointment in Netanyahu himself.

"There is no doubt Netanyahu is the tragic figure in these elections. Despite the huge advantage with which he set out ... he ended up as, at best, a weak prime minister whose coalition will depend on the wishes of the big winner in these elections, Yair Lapid."

___

Associated Press Writer Josh Lederman in Washington contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2013-01-23-ML-Israel-Election/id-8cae0c48807a4fcdb795442f2b196cd5

aubrey huff the killers julianne hough brandy michael pineda charles taylor

Making a Personal Injury Claim for Medical Negligence by Yourself ...

Guest post regarding making a personal injury claim for medical negligence by yourself and the challenges you should consider.

Being injured by or whilst in the care of a healthcare provider can be very unpleasant. You may be overcome with feelings of helplessness and anger. These are common and to be expected, especially if the injury is so severe that it causes a decrease in your quality of life. Although, financial remuneration will be far from the top of your concerns, it is something that should be considered to alleviate the distress caused.

Claiming for medical negligence (sometimes referred to as medical malpractice) is an option available to receive what some people call justice. If your claim is successful it will mean that the healthcare provider will be forced to pay out a sum of money deemed appropriate for the injuries incurred. These can be used for whatever purpose you wish, although there may be an amount set aside for improving your home to help with access and day to day living.

Proving Medical Negligence: What is involved?

Proving medical negligence to a court is essentially the same as proving Personal Injury. The specific area of law being Tort in England and Wales and Delict in Scotland. These are different names for the same thing, the Scottish legal system being slightly different than its neighbours in the south. However, the following principles are universal.

To prove medical negligence you must demonstrate on a balance of probabilities (meaning as a percentage your argument is more than 50% likely to be true), all of the following:

  1. A duty of care was owed to you by the defending party.
  2. There was:
    1. A breach of said duty.
    2. This breach caused or contributed to the claimed injury; essentially there was a negligent action.
    3. The negligent action caused the injury complained of.

Proving that a duty of care was owed and the facts you are asserting are usually the ?easier? parts of a case to prove. In cases involving medical negligence the most difficult thing to prove is the negligence itself ? or at least proving that the actions of the care giver can be deemed as being negligent.

What are the Difficulties?

The reason for this is a historic issue, in fact the Pearson Commission reported as far back as 1978 that whilst general claims for general negligence cases had an 86% success rate, only 30-40% of medical negligence cases resulted in an award of damages.

The reason so many cases are unsuccessful at proving that a doctor or other healthcare provider acted negligently is because of the courts unwillingness to interfere or challenge the medical profession. In fact, in order to successfully defend a case of medical negligence all that is required is for there to be body of other medical professionals who state that they would have taken the same action, even if this body is by far in the minority.

This is not to say that all is hopeless, rather it is better to be equipped with the difficulties that may lie ahead. On top of the legal principles being in the defending party?s favour, statistically people who represent themselves are much more likely to fail in their bid for damages.

Can these be Overcome?

In a word, yes. This is not to say that everyone will be successful in their claims but merely to underline that if you tackle the case in the right way, with the right preparation and knowledge you will be much better placed to succeed.

To begin with, ensure you have a detailed? time-line of all relevant events with names of all persons included. Supplement this with a concise statement of all the facts surrounding your case; include your assertion of how you believe the injury resulted, names of all hospitals or doctors/care givers. You can then begin by addressing this to the NHS Litigation Authority (if the injury occurred in an NHS Hospital) or apply to the relevant court for your case to be heard.

If you are wanting to make a claim for medical negligence it is advisable to seek professional help from a solicitor, even if only for a consultation to discuss the merits of your claim. However, if you are going to be claiming by yourself you should seek out websites offering expert help to get you started and to learn as much as possible about the relevant law.

Personal Injury Claims Blawg is a personal injury law blog. Register today via the get started button above to join us as a guest personal injury law blogger.

No related posts.

Source: http://www.personalinjuryclaimsblawg.com/medical-negligence-solicitors/making-a-personal-injury-claim-for-medical-negligence-by-yourself

contraband denver vs new england denver broncos vs new england patriots cruise ship sinking vernon davis starship troopers starship troopers

Cameron promises Britons contentious vote on EU future

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron on Wednesday promised Britons a vote on whether the country should stay in the European Union or leave, rattling London's biggest allies and some investors by raising the prospect of uncertainty and upheaval.

Cameron announced the referendum would be held by the end of 2017, provided he wins the next election, and said that while Britain did not want to retreat from the world, public disillusionment with the EU was at "an all-time high".

"It is time for the British people to have their say. It is time for us to settle this question about Britain and Europe," Cameron said in a speech, adding that his Conservative party would campaign for the 2015 election on a promise to renegotiate the terms of Britain's EU membership.

"When we have negotiated that new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a very simple in or out choice to stay in the European Union on these new terms; or come out altogether. It will be an in-out referendum."

A referendum would mark the second time Britons have voted on the issue. In 1975, they decided by a wide margin to stay in the EU's predecessor, two years after the country had joined.

Domestically, Cameron stands on relatively firm ground. Most recent opinion polls have shown a slim majority would vote to leave the EU amid often bitter disenchantment about its influence on the British way of life. However, a poll this week showed a majority wanted to stay.

Cameron's position is fraught with uncertainty. He must come from behind to win the next election, secure support from the EU's 26 other states for a new British role, and hope those countries can persuade their voters to back the changes.

Critics say that in the long run-up to a vote, Britain would slip into a dangerous and damaging limbo that could leave the country adrift or pushed out of the EU.

The United States, a close ally, is also uneasy about the plan, believing it will dilute Britain's international clout. President Barack Obama told Cameron by phone last week that Washington valued "a strong UK in a strong European Union".

Some of Britain's European partners were also anxious and told Cameron on Wednesday his strategy reflected a selfish and ignorant attitude. However, Angela Merkel, the leader of EU paymaster Germany, was quick to say she was ready to discuss Cameron's ideas.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius was less diplomatic, quipping: "If Britain wants to leave Europe we will roll out the red carpet for you," echoing Cameron, who once used the same words to invite rich Frenchmen alienated by high taxes to move to Britain.

Billed by commentators as the most important speech of Cameron's career, his referendum promise ties him firmly to an issue that has bedeviled a generation of Conservative leaders.

In the past, he has been careful to avoid bruising partisan fights over Europe, an issue that undid the last two Conservative prime ministers, John Major and Margaret Thatcher.

His speech appeared to pacify a powerful Eurosceptic wing inside his own party, but deepen rifts with the Liberal Democrats, the junior partners in his coalition. Their leader, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, said the plan would undermine a fragile economic recovery.

Sterling fell to its lowest in nearly five months against the dollar on Wednesday as Cameron was speaking.

"BREXIT"?

Cameron said he would seek to claw back powers from Brussels, saying later in parliament that when it came to employment, social and environmental legislation "Europe has gone far too far".

But such a claw back - the subject of an internal audit to identify which powers he should target for repatriation - is likely to be easier said than done.

If Cameron wins the election but then fails to renegotiate Britain's membership of the EU, a 'Brexit' could loom.

Business leaders have warned that years of doubt over Britain's EU membership would damage the $2.5 trillion economy and cool the investment climate.

"Having a referendum creates more uncertainty and we don't need that," Martin Sorrell, chief executive of advertising giant WPP, told the World Economic Forum in Davos. "This is a political decision. This is not an economic decision. This isn't good news. You added another reason why people will postpone investment decisions."

Cameron has been pushed into taking such a strong position partly by the rise of the UK Independence Party, which favors complete withdrawal from the EU and has climbed to third in the opinion polls, mainly at the expense of the Conservatives.

"All he's trying to do is to kick the can down the road and to try and get UKIP off his back," said UKIP leader Nigel Farage.

Eurosceptics in Cameron's party, who have threatened to stir up trouble for the premier, were thrilled by the speech.

Conservative lawmaker Peter Bone called it "a terrific victory" that would unify 98 percent of the party. "He's the first prime minister to say he wants to bring back powers from Brussels," Bone told Reuters. "It's pretty powerful stuff".

Whether Cameron holds the referendum remains as uncertain as the Conservatives' chances of winning the election. They trail the opposition Labour party in opinion polls, and the coalition is grappling with a stagnating economy as it pushes through unpopular public spending cuts to reduce a large budget deficit.

Labour leader Ed Miliband said on Wednesday his party did not want an in/out referendum.

EU REFORM

Cameron said he would campaign for Britain to stay in the EU "with all my heart and soul", provided he secured the reforms he wants. He made clear the EU must become less bureaucratic and focus more on trade deals. It was riskier to maintain the status quo than to change, he said.

"The biggest danger to the European Union comes not from those who advocate change, but from those who denounce new thinking as heresy," he said.

Cameron said the euro zone debt crisis was forcing the bloc to change and that Britain would fight to make sure new rules were fair to the 10 countries that don't use the common currency, of which Britain is the largest.

Democratic consent for the EU in Britain was now "wafer thin", he said. "Some people say that to point this out is irresponsible, creates uncertainty for business and puts a question mark over Britain's place in the European Union," said Cameron. "But the question mark is already there: ignoring it won't make it go away."

A YouGov opinion poll on Monday showed that more people wanted to stay in the EU than leave it, the first such result in many months. But it was unclear whether that result was a blip.

Paul Chipperfield, a 53-year-old management consultant, said he liked the strategy. "Cameron's making the right move because I don't think we've had enough debate in this country," he told Reuters. "We should be part of the EU but the EU needs to recognize that not everybody's going to jump on the same bandwagon."

Asked after the speech whether other EU countries would agree to renegotiate Britain's membership, Cameron said he was an optimist and that there was "every chance of success".

"I don't want Britain to leave the EU," he told parliament later. "I want Britain to reform the EU."

In the 1975 referendum, just over 67 percent voted to stay inside with nearly 33 percent against.

(Additional reporting by Paul Taylor in Davos, Alexandra Hudson in Berlin and Brenda Goh in London; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and David Stamp)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/cameron-promise-britons-straight-choice-eu-exit-075348579--business.html

sanctum the notebook duke basketball miranda july joe paterno near death joepa sc primary

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Unprecedented glacier melting in the Andes blamed on climate change

Jan. 22, 2013 ? Glaciers in the tropical Andes have been retreating at increasing rate since the 1970s, scientists write in the most comprehensive review to date of Andean glacier observations. The researchers blame the melting on rising temperatures as the region has warmed about 0.7?C over the past 50 years (1950-1994). This unprecedented retreat could affect water supply to Andean populations in the near future. These conclusions are published January 22 in The Cryosphere, an Open Access journal of the European Geosciences Union (EGU).

The international team of scientists -- uniting researchers from Europe, South America and the US -- shows in the new paper that, since the 1970s, glaciers in tropical Andes have been melting at a rate unprecedented in the past 300 years. Globally, glaciers have been retreating at a moderate pace as the planet warmed after the peak of the Little Ice Age, a cold period lasting from the 16th to the mid-19th century. Over the past few decades, however, the rate of melting has increased steeply in the tropical Andes. Glaciers in the mountain range have shrunk by an average of 30-50% since the 1970s, according to Antoine Rabatel, researcher at the Laboratory for Glaciology and Environmental Geophysics in Grenoble, France, and lead author of the study.

Glaciers are retreating everywhere in the tropical Andes, but the melting is more pronounced for small glaciers at low altitudes, the authors report. Glaciers at altitudes below 5,400 metres have lost about 1.35 metres in ice thickness (an average of 1.2 metres of water equivalent [see note]) per year since the late 1970s, twice the rate of the larger, high-altitude glaciers.

"Because the maximum thickness of these small, low-altitude glaciers rarely exceeds 40 metres, with such an annual loss they will probably completely disappear within the coming decades," says Rabatel.

The researchers further report that the amount of rainfall in the region did not change much over the past few decades and, therefore, cannot account for changes in glacier retreat. Instead, climate change is to blame for the melting: regional temperatures increased an average of 0.15?C per decade over the 1950-1994 period.

"Our study is important in the run-up to the next IPCC report, coming out in 2013," says Rabatel. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has pointed out that tropical glaciers are key indicators of recent climate change as they are particularly sensitive to temperature changes. The tropical Andes host 99% of all tropical glaciers in the world, most of them in Peru.

The research is also important to anticipate the future behaviour of Andean glaciers and the impact of their accelerated melting on the region. "The ongoing recession of Andean glaciers will become increasingly problematic for regions depending on water resources supplied by glacierised mountain catchments, particularly in Peru," the scientists write. Without changes in precipitation, the region could face water shortages in the future.

The Santa River valley in Peru will be most affected, as its hundreds of thousands of inhabitants heavily rely on glacier water for agriculture, domestic consumption, and hydropower. Large cities, such as La Paz in Bolivia, could also face shortages. "Glaciers provide about 15% of the La Paz water supply throughout the year, increasing to about 27% during the dry season," says Alvaro Soruco, a Bolivian researcher who took part in the study.

In their comprehensive review of Andean glaciers, the scientists synthesised data collected over several decades, some dating as far back as the 1940s. "The methods we used to monitor glacier changes in this region include field observations of glacier mass balance, and remote-sensing measurements based on aerial photographs and satellite images for glacier surface and volume changes," explains Rabatel.

The study takes into account data collected for glaciers in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia, covering a total of almost a thousand square kilometres. This corresponds to about 50% of the total area covered by glaciers in the tropical Andes in the early 2000s.

The research was conducted to provide the scientific community with a comprehensive overview of the status of glaciers in the tropical Andes and determine the rate of retreat and identify potential causes for the melting. But the authors hope the results can have a wider impact.

"This study has been conducted with scientific motivations, but if the insight it provides can motivate political decisions to mitigate anthropogenic impact on climate and glacier retreat, it will be an important step forward," Rabatel concludes.

Note

Glacier mass balance is the difference between ice accumulation and ablation (melting and sublimation) in a glacier. Scientists express the annual mass balance in metre water equivalent (m w.e.). A loss of 1.2 m w.e. corresponds to a reduction of about 1.35 metres in ice thickness.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by European Geosciences Union.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. A. Rabatel, B. Francou, A. Soruco, J. Gomez, B. C?ceres, J. L. Ceballos, R. Basantes, M. Vuille, J.-E. Sicart, C. Huggel, M. Scheel, Y. Lejeune, Y. Arnaud, M. Collet, T. Condom, G. Consoli, V. Favier, V. Jomelli, R. Galarraga, P. Ginot, L. Maisincho, J. Mendoza, M. M?n?goz, E. Ramirez, P. Ribstein, W. Suarez, M. Villacis, P. Wagnon. Current state of glaciers in the tropical Andes: a multi-century perspective on glacier evolution and climate change. The Cryosphere, 2013; 7 (1): 81 DOI: 10.5194/tc-7-81-2013

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_environment/~3/Doqs40P96rc/130122101907.htm

match day nene dark shadows trailer nate mcmillan clooney arrested southern miss rod blagojevich

Internet Marketing Rules Blog: How Direct Response Marketing Can ...

When it comes to internet marketing, you should know that it?s not quite so different than offline marketing. The only thing that is different is the medium. In fact, you shouldn?t really look at your business as an ?online business?? instead, you should look at internet marketing as just another marketing tool that you can use to grow your profits.

But I understand if you want to consider ?online marketing? as a business. There?s another platform that people are making money with and that is called ?mobile marketing?. It?s not as gigantic as the internet, but you can earn a sizable income simply with mobile marketing alone.

No matter how you look at it, promoting your website everywhere is essential. And when you do promote your website everywhere, you don?t want to do traditional marketing strategies such as brand advertising.

Instead, you should be focusing on something called ?direct response marketing?.

What is direct response marketing? It?s simply a way of promoting your products and services, and expecting to see results immediately. There?s no waiting for exposure, no wasted advertising, and no delay of results. Either the ad or campaign works now, or it simply won?t in the future.

Large companies love to spend millions of dollars all over the internet promoting their name in attempts to build brand recognition. But I guarantee you that there is a far better marketing strategy than doing this. If these big businesses could use direct response marketing, their income would skyrocket. And I know this because large companies are hiring marketing consultants all the time for their business!

So, if you want to turn your internet business around, you need to focus on direct response marketing techniques. It doesn?t matter what your internet business is? it doesn?t matter if you sell cupcakes, floor tiles, web hosting services, ebooks and information products, or even real estate. Direct response can work for you.

Never in your life should you be focusing on ?getting your name out there?. This can cause the rapid rate of business failure you?ve ever seen? almost faster than the speed of light. You will waste alot of money this way, and it?s just not a solid way to grow a business and build profits.

If you don?t know much about internet marketing, don?t hire a marketing agency. You can do the easy work yourself, and there?s all kinds of software and services that you can use to track your progress. I suggest you use these tools to track your productivity, and make sure that you?re getting the targeted traffic and income that you are looking for.

Direct response marketing takes the cake in my book. Traditional brand marketing and techniques such as cold calling are simply ineffective and wastes alot of time, energy, and money. So if you want to super-charge your profits ? stick with direct response marketing alone.

You will hear alot of people saying that brand advertising is the way to go, and that you should consider billboard advertising. Billboard advertising is fine when it?s done right, but most of the time it?s a mess. Stick to what works, and that is easier to do.

Good luck with making your internet business successful today.

For more internet marketing secrets, simply visit the website below:
http://www.internetmarketing-rules.com/internetmarketing.html

Source: http://blog.internetmarketing-rules.com/2013/01/how-direct-response-marketing-can.html

mock draft north country brian mcknight sbux nfldraft asante samuel salton sea